Posted by: Josh Lehner | October 1, 2014

How Do You Like Them Apples?

Last weekend, my family and I went to a local orchard and picked apples. Besides being fun and delicious, it turns out that October is national apple month, which I did not know. Anyway, it got be thinking more about apples, how much the northwest produces (Washington mostly, but Oregon as well) , exports and also about the huge variety of apples out there. Plus all of this gives a nice excuse to blog some data outside our office’s core functions. I have managed to combine USDA data from a few different sources (historical data here, more recent years here).

The first graph shows the amount of apples used for fresh produce or processed (dried fruit, juice, etc) along with the price farmers receive for the crop. Fresh apples are now at an all-time high while processed apples have stabilized in recent years, albeit down from their 1990s levels. Overall, if you add the two green lines together, it shows that apple production has basically remained unchanged in recent decades, even as the composition has shifted. Prices have risen in the past decade, partly due to the mix of type of apples and their use, but also due to harvest levels, acres planted, demand for apples, and the like.


In terms of where apples are produced, it’s no surprise that Washington dominates (about 60 percent of the utilized production). Oregon, however, ranks in the Top 10 and accounts for about 1.2-1.4% of the national total. According to the 2007 Census of Agriculture (see map), the largest concentrations of orchards in Oregon are in Umatilla County, a little in the Gorge, in the Willamette Valley and on the Idaho-Oregon border near Ontario.

Fresh apple exports totaled over $1.2 billion in 2013, while so far in 2014 they’re slightly behind that pace. Here, Washington accounts for about 75 percent of the exports and Oregon just 0.4 percent in 2013. Fresh apple exports have increased substantially in the past decade, at least in dollar value, however it is hard to tell how much of the increase is due to higher apple prices versus more pounds actually being exported.

Overall apple produciton has actually been pretty stable in recent decades, however the varieties or types of apples grown has shifted. Long-standing leaders such as Red Delicious and Golden Delicious have seen declines of 30-40 percent, while Granny Smith apples have held steady. Gains are seen in most other varieties with Fuji and Gala in particular increasing market share, so to speak.


Another key feature of agricultural sector more broadly is it’s impact on local and regional economies. Way back when we first examined Portland, Seattle and the Rest, one of our working hypothesis was that strong apple harvests and higher prices helped rural Washington counties during the Great Recession. We still think this is likely one reason (plus they didn’t have a housing bubble), and it shows the importance and influence the sector has. Similarly, good agricultural harvests have helped the Columbia Gorge here in Oregon and higher wheat prices in recent years have helped Eastern Oregon as well.

Lastly, one the greatest benefits of apples is that you can do this.


Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 30, 2014

Oregon Personal Income, 2014q2

This morning the BEA released new personal income data at the state level, along with annual revisions. Overall, it brings more good news for the Oregon economy but also fits in on both sides of those two economic narratives. In aggregate, Oregon has now hit an important milestone in that inflation-adjusted personal income excluding transfer payments is now back to pre-recession levels. That’s a mouthful. What it means is that the fundamental income underlying the economy is now back to pre-recession levels. The reason we sometimes exclude transfer payments — which serve a vital role during recessions — is that they are usually tied more to the need-based aspects of the business cycle and to an aging population with increased Social Security, and the like. The former aspect usually recedes during expansions while the latter increases steadily over time.


The table shows the various components that make up personal income. Overall in the second quarter, Oregon’s income growth was the 6th fastest in the country over the past year and 12th fastest if focusing on the growth from the first quarter to the second quarter. These gains follow the state’s strong employment growth (relative to other states) in the past couple of years.


In terms of how some of the major components have fared over the business cycle, the graph below shows changes in inflation-adjusted income for four of the major types of income. Both wages and supplements to wages (effectively, benefits) are now back to pre-recession peak levels. Employment isn’t far behind either. The good news here is that benefits have shown the same amount of growth as wages. Another indicator that shows the recovery has not created just so-called bad jobs (part-time, no benefit, low pay, etc).


The spike in dividends, interest and rent at the end of 2012 was the pull forward impact of federal tax changes in 2013 when the Bush tax cuts expired for the highest income earners. Lastly, nonfarm proprietor’s income has done well. This income can be thought of as small business income — partnerships, practices, sole proprietors and the like. Now, not all small businesses have fared well, but some certainly have. These gains likely also reflect the long term trend away from C corporations into so-called pass through entities like S corporations and LLCs and the like.

Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 26, 2014

Those Two Economic Narratives

Right now there are two main economic narratives out there. The first is that the economy isn’t getting better, that for most people and most households, the recovery has been minimal, at best. The second is that the economy really is getting better overall, that job growth is picking up, wages are growing and fundamental improvements are being seen. The truth of the matter is that both are correct. These are not mutually exclusive storylines, even if they may appear to be. Below are a few graphs illustrating these trends.

Narrative One: No Real Progress

Examining median family income from the Census Bureau and median family net worth from the Federal Reserve shows that progress, such that it is, has barely kept pace with inflation. Median income in 2013 remains over 7 percent below pre-recession levels and median net worth is 40 percent lower. Much of the net worth for the typical family is tied to their home. With the housing crash, net worth fell, however the foreclosure crisis has held down gains in recovery as fewer people own their home today than a decade ago. Much of the wealth gains in recent years have been tied to asset markets and less to housing. So, for the typical worker or family, the recovery has brought gains in-line with the rate of inflation, but not significantly faster.


Narrative Two: Sizable Improvements Overall

Another way to characterize the economic recovery is that progress is being made overall. More individuals have jobs and wages are growing. The unemployment rate is falling, for both good and bad reasons. Given the demographic and structural trends, it can be helpful to focus on the so-called prime working age groups to see this progress. Below I have updated the data showing the employment-population ratio for 25-44 year olds. Here you can see that even with a lower labor force participation rate, more college enrollment and the like, the share of individuals with a job really is increasing. Oregon’s trends track the national average, although given the small sample size in the state, our data is more noisy from month to month.


While Portland, and it’s younger generations in particular, has been a hot topic lately (see the NY Times and a nice response from Joe Cortright), the city really is in the middle of the pack in terms of the employment-population ratio. Portland is right at the median of the 50 largest metros in the country. Ranking below Denver, Minneapolis and San Francisco, among others, but above places like Houston, Seattle, New York and L.A.


In total, the economy truly is getting better, with more individuals with a job, and wage growth is slightly faster than inflation. However, when it comes to the median worker, or the typical family, not much progress has been made. Both narratives are correct and they do coexist in today’s economy. In our office, we tend to focus more on the second narrative largely because our primary task is forecasting the total state economy and revenues from the economic activity. We focus less on the distribution of those gains (or losses) and more on the aggregate. That does not mean it’s a better way to characterize the economy, however it is important to understand both narratives to get a more complete picture of the progress, or lack thereof.

Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 24, 2014

Housing Market Update

Just a quick, partial update on the ownership side of the housing market. Still planning on releasing a more thorough look in the next month, including the rental side as well.

The number of homes sold across the U.S. was up and the highest in six years, according to the latest data released this morning. That’s good. While the overall housing market, particularly on the ownership and construction side of things, stalled out in the past year or two, it may be picking up again. The good news is that examining the fundamentals within the housing market yields even more favorable news.

First, with rising home prices, and more improtantly rising home equity, the share of homes sold for a loss is falling. During the depths of the housing and foreclosure crisis, 1 in every 2 homes sold in Bend or Medford was sold for a loss. In Oregon overall and the U.S. (not shown) it peaked at about 1 in every 3 homes. These figures have improve considerably in the past 2 years, along with the housing recovery. Today the figures are about 1/3 to 1/2 smaller than their peak shares.


Another good sign that the market is finding some semblance of balance is the sales to list price ratio. This indicates a couple of things. First, it means buyers are generally pricing the homes right, in terms of attracting buyers. Second, this does also reflect stronger competition for homes. Given the low inventory on the market, bidding wars have been more commonplace in recent years, with homes being sold above asking price in sought-after areas or neighborhoods.


Lastly, price appreciation is beginning to slow. Overall that’s also good. The cyclical rebound in home prices appears to be over or about over in many locations. Prices today are, more or less, back to historical trends if you were to cut through the boom and bust nature of the past decade. As such, our office’s forecast continues to call for home price gains in the coming years to be more in-line with overall inflation.


The fundamentals underlying the ownership side of housing appear to be getting back in balance, given recent trends. Not back to pre-recession levels, but back in some equilibrium, which is at a lower level so far. Inventory is rising, albeit slowly. With underwater homes becoming fewer in number, expect inventory to climb. As the economy continues to recover, with more employed individuals, household formation will likewise continue to pick up. Home prices are set to rise further, however the very strong appreciation rates are likely behind us. However that does not rule out a near-term price correction in some markets, where prices may have risen a little too fast, too quickly. Overall, just as the economy is getting there, so too is the housing market.

Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 23, 2014

Central Oregon, Sept 2014 Edition

This post continues with our regular series on the regions within Oregon. For more, see the regional tab at the top of the page.

Central Oregon, situated in the hub of the state, has experienced tremendous population growth in recent decades, helping drive the regional economy.


These gains are not only tied to housing and related industries – which are strong in Central Oregon – but also a much higher rate of self-employment. In a region that has generally had an unemployment rate higher than the state and nation, in addition to a lower labor force participation rate, self-employment, either by choice or by necessity, can go a long way.


Like much of the state, Central Oregon has experienced two severe recessions: the early 80s and the Great Recession. Although the housing bust in the area is the second worst regional downturn in recorded Oregon history (post WWII), trailing only the early 80s downturn in Coos Bay. The good news is following three years of zero job growth from 2009-2011, employment in Central Oregon has increased at nearly a 5 percent rate since.


Some of this growth is fueled by a return of population growth, in particular domestic in-migration, and the increased housing activity that goes along with it. The region is home to about 5 percent of the state’s population but last year it built 16 percent of the state’s single family homes. Given the lack of new construction during the Great Recession and initial part of the recovery, even in a location such as Bend, existing inventory is very low. As population growth has returned, so too has the need and demand for more homes.

CentralPopConstThe region’s demographics skew slightly older. Deschutes and Jefferson have above average shares of under 18 year olds. However all 3 counties have above average shares of the population 65 and older, which is at least partly due to retirement aged in-migrants moving to Central Oregon.

Finally, the top 10 industries in Central Oregon are shown below. These are location quotients for 2013 and measure the relative concentration of these industries.

CentralLQ2013For more on the region, see the Oregon Employment Department’s website for Region 10 and the extensive list of recent articles by regional economist, Damon Runberg. For more on our office’s regional coverage in Oregon, please see here.

Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 16, 2014

August Employment, 2014

A couple of notes about today’s employment release.

1) Unemployment Rate.

As with nearly all measures, the unemployment rate is not perfect. The biggest issue with it is that the unemployment rate can go up for good reasons and go down for bad reasons. Today’s job report is an example of the former. The labor force is growing, as more people are looking for work. This is good news as it signals that more people are moving to Oregon and/or more Oregonians are being drawn back into the workforce as job opportunities increase. However, such changes do keep the unemployment rate high, even if the the underlying economy is improving. These dynamics, including the labor force response, are something our office has been discussing quite a bit this year.


2) Monthly Employment Estimates.

Economic data is noisy. Particularly real time monthly estimates. While less interesting, the real story is usually in the revisions, particularly now that our friends at the Employment Department are doing quarterly benchmarking as well. For example, the June employment estimate was initially said to be -4,300 jobs. This was revised to -3,000 the following month when July was initially estimated to be a gain of just 200 jobs. This was revised today to show a gain of 1,300. Each month was a swing of more than 1,000. Both happen to be swings in the positive direction, however you can find negative swings in recent years as well.

So, focusing purely on that initial employment change can be problematic, some times very problematic. However, we still use it as an indicator of the underlying economy. Our office uses the benchmarked employment data as the backbone of a lot of our models, but the most recent monthly data is used more as an indicator. Not unlike a lot of the other leading and coincident indicators available, either from our office of the University of Oregon. As we write in each of our forecast documents, our offices uses four main sources for jobs data: payroll employment, household survey, monthly withholding tax receipts and the quarterly census of employment and wages. Generally, all tell a similar story however when one does not, it helps to place it in the broader context of the other indicators available.

The greatest benefit of the CES (monthly establishment survey) is its timeliness, however it can be subject to substantial revisions. In fact, if you go back and look at the past 2 years of benchmarked data, the 95% confidence interval around that initial monthly employment change is +/- 7,000 jobs. That means in August, Oregon’s employment changed somewhere between a gain of 10,000 or a loss of 4,000. Or to put it differently, there was about a 1 in 6 chance that Oregon actually lost jobs in August instead of the reported 2,900 gain.

Again, that does not mean one should ignore the monthly estimates, but do take them with a grain of salt. Combining them with the other available measures helps place the trajectory of the economy in perspective.

With that being said, however, one monthly estimate that you can freely ignore is the state level ADP report. As seen below, since ADP began releasing state level employment estimates on a monthly basis in April 2013, their ability to predict what the official BLS estimates will be is pretty minimal.


Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 15, 2014

Columbia Gorge, Sept 2014 Edition

This post continues with our regular series on the regions within Oregon. For more, see the regional tab at the top of the page.

The mighty Columbia River, second largest in the U.S., borders the Gorge to the North and divides Oregon and Washington. However, the true regional economy bridges the river and the two states. While the job base, with strong concentrations in agriculture – in particular fruits like cherries and pears – is divided on both sides of the river, much of the economic activity, retail sales and leisure and hospitality is primarily conducted on the Oregon side of the Gorge.


A region of strength throughout the Great Recession, the Columbia Gorge outperformed both the state and nation in terms of job losses and recovery.


This economic performance can be tied, at least partially, to three major factors. First, higher commodity prices and good harvests have supported the strong agricultural sector. Second, the regions energy industry has been both a growth driver early in recession with the construction of wind farms, and stabilizing factor with the hydroelectric dams. The region is home to over 4 percent of the entire country’s wind and hydro energy capacity and 60 percent of Oregon’s. Third, the emergence and growth of the unmanned aerial vehicle industry has benefited the region on both sides of the river.


As our office has discussed previously, the border tax effect is real and the Oregon-Washington differences provide a natural experiment, particularly among sin taxes. The border tax effect is particularly pronounced in the Columbia Gorge given that much of the population and most stores and restaurants are on the Oregon side of the river. As such, even though personal income trends are nearly identical on either side of the Columbia, retail sales per capita are 5 times larger in Oregon than in Washington in the region. In total, retail sales are over 8 times larger, however the population base is larger as well in Oregon.


The region’s demographics are fairly balanced relative to the state. However the relative share of children under 18 years old is higher, driven by Hood River, while Wasco matches the state average. The working age population is smaller with the retirement age population larger.

Finally, the top 10 industries in the Gorge are shown below. These are location quotients for 2013 and measure the relative concentration of these industries.

GorgeLQ2013For more on the region, see the Oregon Employment Department’s website for Region 9 and the extensive list of recent articles by regional economist, Dallas Fridley. For more on our office’s regional coverage in Oregon, please see here.


Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 10, 2014

Industry Structure and Growth

There are a number of ways to achieve economic growth. Increases in productivity is one. Firms can invest in new capital, helping drive gains. The existing workforce can become better educated (including non-degree programs). Increases in the overall size of the economy is another. Population growth can pick up, helping to drive workforce increases and business sales with more consumers. Higher start-up rates increase the number of firms and innovation. Businesses can move to the area, due to clusters and/or recruitment efforts. Or, the local industrial mix can be beneficial with the sectors doing well having high concentrations locally. Our office has been exploring these various growth avenues to get a better handle on the state’s economy moving forward, and they are certainly not mutually exclusive. Mark and Kanhaiya will have more on population/migration next month, for example. What follows today, however, is a look at Oregon’s industrial structure and expected job growth over the next decade.

The biggest takeaway is that the coming decade will be both a challenge and an opportunity for the Oregon economy. As touched on previously, two of Oregon’s economic pillars — the forest sector and hardware side of high-tech — are not expected to be job growth leaders in the years ahead. Now, to be sure, Oregon has numerous strengths, both from an industrial perspective and other aspects related to business costs, labor force, geographic location, and the like. However, much of our growth moving forward will come from industries in which Oregon has a somewhat smaller concentration.

The graph below takes Oregon’s traded sector[1] industries and compares the expected employment growth with the relative industry concentration in the state. The growth rates are taken from Oregon Employment Department’s 10 year projections [2]. Given Oregon’s large manufacturing base (and traded sector more broadly) there are more green bars than orange bars because Oregon has more above average industries than the typical state.


First, as stated above, Oregon’s strongest concentrations are in the forest sector and high-tech manufacturing. These industries (dark green) are expected to grow less quickly than many others moving forward. Since the data are for 2012-2022, from today’s employment, these industries are not expected to grow very much further as most of the growth has already been realized or will be this year or next.

The good news are the other green bars. This does include some wood products, but much of the growth is driven by increases in management of companies, food and beverage manufacturing, published software along with gains in crop production and nurseries. It’s a bit of a mix but all of these industries in Oregon are at least 25 percent larger, in a relative sense, than they are nationwide. Many are much larger than that. It is certainly good news that many industries in which Oregon has a high concentration in are expected to do well and outperform other industries moving forward. This pattern of growth will provide a fundamental boost to Oregon’s growth.

The real challenges and opportunities are coming in the orange bars. These industries, like consulting services, computer system design (custom software), financial investments, and scientific R&D, are expected to grow much faster than the typical industry. However, Oregon has a low concentration in these industries today. To the extent that we are behind the curve, so to speak, than the state may not fully realize these gains if they rely more on clusters and concentrations of similar firms that may already exist elsewhere in the country. With that being said, expectations are for these industries to grow quickly here as well, particularly the industries tied to high-tech. While Oregon’s historical strengths have been on the hardware, or manufacturing side of high-tech, the software side is currently driving growth and will likely do so moving forward.

All told, it is somewhat of a mixed bag in terms of Oregon’s industrial structure and expected growth. Many industries in which Oregon has a relatively smaller concentration, will grow quickly in the future. Some of Oregon’s largest industries will grow less quickly. With that being said, there is lots of good news for the state’s economy, and the good news likely outweighs near-term concerns. However, keeping these facts and trends in mind is important. Furthermore, add on top of this the growth in consumer services (or the non-traded sector) which is tied a bit more to population growth, which is picking up as well.


[1] For the specifics of which industries are and are not included and in which categories, please see the attached Excel file. One can reasonably argue which specific industries should and should not be included here and I am open to hearing your thoughts. However, after a number of iterations of this analysis with myriad industries included or excluded, the fundamental, underlying results still stand. This includes both traded and non-traded sectors. The following file can also be used as a rough, working definition of traded sector industries — something I have been unable to find readily available. DOWNLOAD FILE: EmpProjectionsLQ

[2] The employment growth is based on the Oregon Employment Department’s 10 year projections for 2012-2022 (PDF). OED uses our office’s forecast as a base, however they do modify the outlook based on a more detailed look at the 4 and 6 digit NAICS level. OED furthermore produces occupational projections at the regional level as well. Overall the industry projections, as used above, have the same general characteristics, or flavor, as our office’s baseline forecast, even as specifics do vary from industry to industry.

Our office would like to thank OED for their help in providing their detailed data for our use. Our office would also like to thank Business Oregon for their discussion surrounding traded-sector industries.

Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 4, 2014

Changing of the Guard

Oregon remains a natural resource and manufacturing state, which along with our strong migration patterns, are really the two distinctive features that sets the state apart from most others. However the nature of our goods producing industries has changed over the past 40 years. Previously our office has detailed historical trends in both the wood products industry and the high-technology industry. What follows below the fold is a short summary from our latest economic and revenue forecast of how these longer-run trends have effectively offset one another from a top line, statewide perspective. Of course, at a regional level these trends are not offsetting as the geographic footprint and impact of the industries is not the same.



Click here for more.

Posted by: Josh Lehner | September 2, 2014

Graph of the Week: Oregon Manufacturing

Our latest economic and revenue forecast, released last week, featured a section on the historical changes underlying Oregon’s manufacturing and resource industries. It is somewhat timely both for the interest in the state’s manufacturing sector, including relatively recent legislation and agreements, but also given the Labor Day holiday and changing nature of the economy in recent decades. It also brings us this edition of the Graph of the Week, while previewing some additional material still to come.

The large size of Oregon’s manufacturing and resource industries are what set the state apart, relative to others. Over Oregon’s history, such a large degree of exposure to these industries has proven to be both a blessing as well as a curse. Manufacturing and resource industries are highly productive and generate a great deal of ancillary economic activity. At the same time, production in these industries can be volatile and are under tremendous long-run pressures for the competitive forces of globalization and technological change.

With nearly 180,000 workers, Oregon’s manufacturers employ no more people today than they did in 1970. Over this period, the industry’s share of statewide employment has fallen from nearly 1 in 3 to 1 in 10 today. While these job losses have been extreme, they pale in comparison to losses in other states. Aside from a few brief periods, Oregon’s manufacturing payrolls have outperformed those in other regions during both good times and bad. In recent years, Oregon’s relatively modern mix of manufacturers have shield the state somewhat from the large cuts seen among old-line manufactures in the Midwest and South.


Older Posts »



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 301 other followers